InvestorCentric
The news and information that matters to real estate, small business and alternative investors.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Brazil’s Economy Remarkably Strong, But For How Much Longer?

Brazilian flagIn the midst of worldwide reports of falling economies, Brazil’s economy has been remarkably strong. According to Bloomberg, Brazil’s GDP grew 6.8 percent in the third quarter of this year compared to last, up from 6.2 percent growth in the previous quarter year over year. Considering the state of the worldwide economy those numbers are staggering—so staggering that they beat the estimates of all 31 economists polled by Bloomberg. Compared to the constant underperforming of estimates in the U.S., this must be truly exciting for Brazil. On the downside, though, economists are predicting a slowdown for Brazil’s economy, and Morgan Stanley is even predicting a recession for Brazil, according to Bloomberg.

While the talk of recession is probably a bit premature, Brazil will likely see a substantial slowdown in their growth. Economists quoted in the Bloomberg article gave 2009 GDP growth ranges anywhere from 2 to 4 percent. The article also mentioned that certain industries in Brazil were starting to lay off employees, which is never a good sign. However, the layoffs that they mention are nowhere near the level that we are experiencing here in the U.S. We also should remember that 31 of 31 economists underestimated Brazil last time around, so who is to say they won’t do it again?

Brazil is an amazing country with investment potential that has interested me for quite some time. The country has almost every imaginable natural resource and is making great strides towards becoming a world power. I certainly think that we will begin to see a slowdown in their economy as external pressures take their toll on Brazil along with the rest of the world, but I don’t foresee a recession. I think Brazil will continue to grow, albeit at a slower pace than before. Once the global economy begins to turn around I see Brazil taking off once again.

We hear a lot about the BRIC economies (Brazil, Russia, India and China), but of those four Brazil seems to be the least discussed. India and China have their huge populations and incredible growth numbers, and Russia has its huge oil reserves. Brazil always trailed them in growth and in investment hype. To me, though, I think Brazil has as much potential as the others, if not more. India and China have huge populations, but they also are facing some huge problems, such as water shortages. They also are almost entirely dependent on other countries for their energy needs. Russia has abundant water and energy, but their government is repressive. Brazil has tons of fresh water, is energy independent, and though their government is not perfect by any stretch of the imagination, it continues to improve and seems to be headed in the right direction. In addition, the fact that Brazil has not had the same type of investment hype as the other countries is a good thing for investors. Over the long term I think we might see Brazil moving to the head of the BRIC class, and it might happen sooner than we think.

Labels: , , , , ,



Tuesday, May 6, 2008

The Water Crisis: Saving For A Sunny Day

Summer is approaching, and with it comes anticipation of all its pleasure: picnics, barbecues, baseball, summer vacation and life-destroying drought. From San Diego to Atlanta, from below the Texas border to the Rockies, people of the Sun Belt are bracing for another summer of watering the lawn with their bathwater...at night...wearing a ski mask to avoid hefty fines. Just what are people doing to prepare and conserve in these hard-hit places? Let’s start with my old hometown, Atlanta...

To celebrate Sunny Perdue’s “Take a Shorter Shower” month, Stone Mountain Park premiered its Snow Mountain attraction last November. The 1.2 million gallon slush ball was conceived to give sunny Atlanta a most deserved winter wonderland, but apparently a bunch of prissy naysayers who like taking showers more than seeing children happy shut the attraction down after opening day. Reprehensible isn’t it? What had they to complain about? Besides this:

“Snow blowers were pulling water from the DeKalb County water system, instead of the park's lake because park officials wanted the snow to be pure white.”

People in Georgia wanting something to be pure white?! NEVER!

Ahem...

In a state where there are no natural lakes (the main reservoir, Lake Lanier, is a flooded town that routinely stuns and drowns swimmers with debris floating from the bottom), and where most of the watersheds have been paved over for parking lots and tract housing (Georgia’s lack of natural barriers made it prime for unchecked growth for the last decade), one would think that the legislature would have a better contingency plan than “Screw over Alabama and Florida” but that’s what it boils down to. Water wars between the three states have been flaring for over 15 years, and last year saw a particularly nasty clash between Georgia and Florida when the Northern Aggressor—in a rare, bipartisan decision—voted to divert millions of gallons of water that had been promised to Florida to protect endangered mussels and sturgeon in the northern lakes. Meanwhile, the hundreds of golf courses across Georgia kept their sprinklers on. As long as they can pay for it, who are we to stop them?

This smacks of an “almighty dollar” scenario that may play out on the other side of the country in Vegas, whose reservoir at Lake Mead is tapped by aqueducts to many surrounding cities. That reservoir is already at half capacity and declining rapidly. According to a report published by researchers at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, Lake Mead may be bone-dry by 2021.

I have heard people suggest that Vegas is protected by the vast wealth contained there, which will allow the city to simply buy water when it becomes necessary... I’m sure those generous casino and hotel moguls will be just thrilled to share with everyone. Might I add that this would necessarily be at the cost of towns that would see their water supply go to a higher bidder? Is this really an ideal scenario to anyone? And can one be sure that Vegas’ coffers won’t dry up as well? Casinos are not recession-proof, and if Cirque du Soleil has to start performing their hit water show “O” in a vat of urine, Vegas may lose its appeal and the house may finally lose a round. Benjamin Franklin said in his Poor Richard’s Almanac: “When the well runs dry, we shall know the true worth of water.” One can only hope that whoever has it will accept feather boas and sequined thongs as payment.

The Lake Mead crisis is complicated by a 1944 water-sharing treaty with Mexico, which guarantees that a certain minimum of potable water from the Colorado River reach the Mexican border. A desalination plant was built just north of the border to make good on this promise, but by the time the river reaches the Colorado River Delta—half a century ago, a two million acre expanse of wetlands and lagoons—it is a mere trickle, and the surrounding area is a salt flat.

Elsewhere, tensions over the Rio Grande water supply continue to rage in South Texas and Mexico. A decade-long water-debt to the U.S. by Mexico was resolved in 2005, but only after an estimated $660 million of losses because of failed crops in the Texas Valley. Texas is seeking redress through NAFTA in Canadian courts for these losses, and the soured relations between the two states show no signs of improvement.

During the worst years of the drought, the government did what it could to aid Southern farmers by funding updates and improvements to irrigation systems, but reservoirs throughout the Sun Belt are still pitifully limited, and rampant growth in cities such as Vegas and Atlanta and Phoenix (which seems to have the soundest approach to the water crisis of the three) threaten to turn these towns into dust bins in a matter of years. As much as some people would like to believe it, this is not a problem that money alone can solve. Only real planning and foresight will be enough to protect these cities from complete desiccation.

If you choose to invest in any city threatened by drought, then do not fail to research the city’s contingency plans and make your own. Increasing interest in sustainable housing is making additions such as home reservoirs more accessible. For those living in drought-affected areas, such considerations may become absolutely vital, and so for those investing in these areas, having a house whose residents can actually take a shower may make the difference between a hot-ticket and sand trap. Now...I’m off to the golf courses!

Labels: , , , ,



Monday, May 5, 2008

What Happens In Vegas Devalues In Vegas

The Las Vegas real estate market has been notoriously hard-hit by the foreclosure crisis: 51 percent of unsold homes in Vegas are now vacant. This has presented investors with a large selection of single-family properties for investment. In a market such as Las Vegas with an abundance of vacant homes, investors should view such purchases as long-term investments and know that it may take several years before a home turns a profit. But what about some of the ultra-lux homes? According to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, luxury homes in Vegas may be second only to a Fried-Scorpion-on-a-Stick Stand in terms of bad investments:

“About 1,000 houses are listed for sale in Las Vegas for $1 million or higher, more than 600 of them built since 2004. But unless they've been constructed in the last year or two, the properties are considered out-of-date, making them all that more difficult to sell, real estate agents say.”

In a town where Hank Overalls becomes Mr. Henry Tuxedo and Lucy Dressbarn becomes Lady Prada von Guccistein overnight, in a place where the word of the moment is always “New!” whereas “Classic” and “Established” are maledictions, it is only natural that the homes be as extravagant and aesthetically bankrupt as their occupants. The trouble is—in case you don’t know—Las Vegas is situated in a flat, hostile desert, and there isn’t much in the way of a view or an established neighborhood. With acres of land available for development and only an impotent Bureau of Land Management to moderate it all, one developer after another (and sometimes the same one, over and over) has created the next “hot” neighborhood, and residents have followed:

“One developer, Christopher Homes, recently opened a neighborhood of homes in the hills west of the Strip selling for $1.7 million to $3 million. Several houses have sold to residents of adjoining neighborhoods who lived in their houses for less than five years, including homes built by the same developer, said Erika Geiser, the company's vice president.”

“‘They feel their residence is obsolete,’ she said. ‘They're looking for something more innovative, more cutting-edge.’”

Cutting-edge, indeed. Like so many glass pianos of yesteryear whose tops are now marred by the fine cuts of straight razors and the occasional syringe, the old homes are indeed pathetic vestiges of a bygone era, and I don’t blame the homeowners from moving on. Here is a table displaying some of the bare necessities that people expect to find in their new homes:

Classic

NEW!

5,000 to 7,000 square feet8,000 to 10,000 square feet
Walk-in showers7 foot by 7 foot showers
Granite tile bathtubGranite slab bathtub
12” by 12” polished travertine tiles in entrance20” by 20” polished travertine tiles in entrance
Stainless steel counters, glass tiles in kitchenStainless steel counters, glass tiles in laundry room
Plastic chandelier Chandelier made of human sternums*
*May or may not be an exaggeration. Would it be all that surprising if it were true?


All of this is to say, it takes knowing the future of what people will want in a home—and where people will want that home—to win at investing in ultra-lux homes in Vegas, and in the end you’re probably better off the blackjack tables. Take the sad story of Mr. William Derentz, for example:

“William Derentz, who heads the company that runs the annual Harvest Festival in Laguna Hills, bought a 5,400-square-foot home in Las Vegas for $2 million in 2004. He never moved in, since he planned to resell it in a year or two at a hoped-for profit of $1 million.”

Alas, the market tanked and defeated Derentz moved into the house in February, but while there, he will remodel the backyard, adding “his-and-her” cabanas to make it a more competitive seller. He may want to make those “his-and-her” reservoirs instead, given that the Las Vegas real estate market may never recover if it runs out of water first.

More on the increasingly dire water crisis in the Southern U.S. and Mexico in tomorrow’s post: “Water, Water Everywhere, But Not A Drop To Fill My 49 Square-Foot Shower,” or perhaps “The Day After Tomorrow Part II: The Day After Cinco De Mayo.”

Labels: , ,



Finance Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Real Estate
Top Blogs
Top Real Estate blogs
TopOfBlogs
© 2007 NuWire Investor and NuWire, Inc. All Rights Reserved.