Most borrowers see mortgage points as a waste of money, but some experts say the current market may make that a bad bet. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has released new guidelines to help borrowers better understand the pros and cons of points. A point is equal to 1% of the loan and is paid up front in exchange for a lower mortgage rate. Many borrowers are unsure how long they will have the loan, which makes it hard for them to decide if points are a good idea – especially if they get a chance to refinance. In this market, though, experts say owning a home for longer is the only way to offset costs and so buying points is more likely a wise decision. For more on this continue reading the following article from TheStreet.
"Should I pay points, or not?"
It’s one of the first questions a mortgage borrower faces, and many simply reject the extra payment as an excessive cost with uncertain benefits. But in today’s market, points can make good sense.
The new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued proposed rules to make it easier to weigh the pros and cons of points. Likely to take effect early in 2013, the rules would allow lenders to continue offering loans with points, reversing a ban in the Dodd-Frank financial reform act of 2010.
Points are upfront interest payments that buy the borrower a lower mortgage rate and, consequently, a lower monthly payment, with each point equal to 1% of the loan amount. At first glance, the borrower’s decision looks simple: if you will have the loan long enough for the lower payment to offset the cost of the points, paying points makes sense.
But loan terms are often hard to fathom, borrowers may not know how long they’ll have the loan, and many don’t want to shell out thousands more when they’re already making big down payments and facing other charges.
In recent years, the no-points option has often paid off, because many borrowers refinanced after just a few years to benefit from falling mortgage rates. They didn’t have their previous loans long enough for a lower payment to offset the cost of the points.
Now things are different. Mortgage rates are so low there is little chance they will fall enough to make refinancing pay, so anyone borrowing today is likely to keep the mortgage until the home is sold or the mortgage is paid off.
Also, even with a recent rebound — and possibly a sustainable housing market turnaround — it’s off a low base caused by the housing crash and it remains hazardous to buy a home unless you plan to keep it for many years, as it may well take five, eight or even 10 years for appreciation to offset broker’s commission and other buying and selling fees. Owning a home for only three or four years could be a money loser, and if you therefore plan to own it longer, paying points could be profitable.
The CFPB proposal would require lenders to offer no-point options alongside mortgages with points, to make apples-to-apples comparisons easier.
Because lenders use a hodgepodge of terms to describe points, the proposed rules would require that regardless of the lender’s terminology points result in a lower mortgage rate. Critics say some lenders have used confusing jargon to get people to pay upfront fees that produced no benefit.
Use BankingMyWay’s Mortgage Points Calculator to judge the potential savings from paying points. It shows how much savings can be realized by paying points if the mortgage is kept for a given number of years. It’s worth running the calculation several times to see, for example, how changing the number of years in the home would affect the potential savings.
Just because something was part of a Dodd-Frank ban and caused many homeowners pain during the years leading up to the bubble bursting doesn’t mean that it can’t be your gain as a homeowner with the CFPB minding the store. In the least, it’s worth pointing out that points don’t have to be a dirty word in the homebuying process.
This article was republished with permission from TheStreet.