Counties in the Southwest and Florida dominate this list of the worst housing markets in the U.S. by ZIP code. Clark County Nevada alone occupies five slots, two of which are in the top three. For more on this, read the following article from HousingWire:
Does the economy’s recovery hinge on housing? Maybe, maybe not. But we do know this: Housing has some serious correcting to do yet ahead of it.
You don’t need to look further than October 2008 data from First American CoreLogic, which found that 7.6 million U.S. borrowers were underwater on their mortgages at that point, with an additional 2.1 million mortgages about to head beneath the water’s surface.
Let the critics say that such a mess of negative equity doesn’t drive defaults. They’ll be proven wrong. Anyone in the servicing trenches knows better, because we’ve seen that borrower equity can cure plenty of ills; we also know that the lack of it leaves a borrower in a tenuous position to manage an economic downturn that, by most accounts, seems likely to hit with a ferocious bite at least through the third quarter of this year.
Perhaps the most staid of all equations in the mortgage servicing business is this: price declines equal borrower defaults.
If you want to know which markets are going to bleed most heavily through this year, then, you need look no further than those markets that are already mostly underwater relative to home equity. With the help of First American CoreLogic, we took at look by ZIP code at which local markets with more than 1,000 mortgages rank among the nation’s worst—not by price decline, or sales volume, but by the number of mortgages that are now underwater.
And the localized data reveals what is still a very grim outlook for California, Nevada and Florida, above all, as well as some areas in Arizona. The first three states are home to the top 10 worst local housing markets—where a market is defined by a particular ZIP code.
Claim up to $26,000 per W2 Employee
- Billions of dollars in funding available
- Funds are available to U.S. Businesses NOW
- This is not a loan. These tax credits do not need to be repaid
In the 95391 ZIP code, home to Tracy, Calif., 1,699 of the 1,856 mortgages in the area are either underwater or very near it. (photo source: Wikipedia)A look at a dubious list of suspects
The nation’s most troubled housing market by this measure would be the town of Tracy, Calif., in San Joaquin County; it’s an exurb of the San Jose/San Franscisco market, part of the Stockton metro area, and boasted a population of roughly 80,000 as recently as 2007.
Ensconced by the 95391 ZIP code, a full 88.7 percent of outstanding mortgage debt in this area is estimated to be underwater, with 91.5 percent of all mortgages ranking as “near negative equity” by First American CoreLogic. Lenders have lost a net $226 million in equity in this market alone, relative to mortgage debt outstanding.
The median income for a household in the city was $62,794 two years ago, according to census data, and the median income for a family was $67,464; sound like a market where median home prices could rise massively relative to incomes?
Sin City has been hit hard, but the number of negative-equity mortgages still in the area suggest it has further to fall. (photo source: Christopher Chan)Despite the severity of the housing price correction already felt there, ZIPs in Las Vegas slotted in at numbers 2 and 3 on the negative-equity list, with their share of active mortgages in negative equity sitting at 87.1 percent and 86.3 percent, respectively.
Between the ZIPS of 89178 and 89166, more than $2.7 billion in mortgage debt remains outstanding; relative to estimated property values in the two ZIPs, lenders have seen more than $350 million in equity evaporate here. The average loan to value ratio in both ZIPs is north of 115 percent LTV—and that’s using data from October 2008.
Fifth on the list is a ZIP in North Las Vegas, as well: 89081. With 7,739 mortgages in the ZIP, a full 82 percent of mortgages are estimated to be underwater. That ZIP alone is responsible for an estimated $241.7 million in lost equity.
Coming in at number four? Rancho Cordova, Calif., home to the 95742 ZIP code and part of Sacramento County in Northern California—84.3 percent of the 2,099 mortgages in the ZIP have reached a negative equity position, CoreLogic’s data showed, while an additional 83 mortgages are considered “near” negative equity as well. The city is near to Tracy, Calif., and is part of the Sacramento–Arden-Arcade–Roseville Metropolitan Statistical Area; yet another NorCal property disaster waiting to unfold.
Not that Northern California and Las Vegas have a corner on the market for lost home equity. Markets in Riverside County, located in Southern California’s Inland Empire region, ranked numbers five and 10 on the neg-am ZIP rankings nationally. A full 76.7 percent of its mortgages are currently underwater in the 92582 ZIP code in Riverside, and 71.0 percent have gone negative in the 92532 ZIP in the same county, the data showed.
The full list of the top 20 negative equity markets is below:
- 95391 (San Joaquin County, CA): 88.7 percent neg-am share
- 89166 (Clark County, NV): 87.1 percent share
- 89178 (Clark County, NV): 86.3 percent share
- 95742 (Sacramento County, CA): 84.3 percent share
- 89081 (Clark County, NV): 82.0 percent share
- 92582 (Riverside County, CA): 76.7 percent share
- 33976 (Lee County, FL): 76.6 percent share
- 33974 (Lee County, FL): 73.6 percent share
- 89139 (Clark County, NV): 71.1 percent share
- 92532 (Riverside County, CA): 71.0 percent share
- 95330 (San Joaquin County, CA): 70.8 percent share
- 33971 (Lee County, FL): 70.4 percent share
- 85339 (Maricopa County, AZ): 69.8 percent share
- 92596 (Riverside County, CA): 69.7 percent share
- 85353 (Maricopa County, AZ): 69.4 percent share
- 92571 (Riverside County, CA): 68.8 percent share
- 34987 (Saint Lucie County, FL): 68.7 percent share
- 33909 (Lee County, FL): 68.5 percent share
- 34288 (Sarasota County, FL): 68.3 percent share
- 89084 (Clark County, NV): 68.2 percent share
Source: First American CoreLogic, data as of Oct. 2008
This article has been reposted from Housing Wire. View the article on HousingWire’s mortgage finance news website here.